Skip to main content

Mentor Review

All contributions go through a mentor review process before points are awarded.

How review works​

  1. A mentor is assigned to review your submission.
  2. They verify the work is complete, original, and meets the contribution guidelines.
  3. Feedback is provided — revisions may be requested.
  4. Once accepted, the contribution is entered into the public ledger.

What mentors look for​

  • Clarity and completeness of the submission.
  • Whether the work meets the stated requirements.
  • Evidence of understanding — not just output, but reasoning.
  • Reusability — can others build on this?

After approval​

Approved contributions are recorded in FlowLedger. Points are credited, and the entry becomes part of your public contribution history.